- Keywords: Technical, Maritime
Relevant for ship owners/managers, design offices, shipyards and suppliers.
Typical damages observed and their consequences
The observed trend is not specific to a vessel type – rather, it reflects operation of the affected vessels in areas with limitations on the draft of the vessel or loading conditions, without suitable precautionary measures to limit the RPM/power of the engine.
Typical damages observed in this regard involve wiping of white-metal-based bearing material in the aft part of the bearing, indicating a complete or partial loss of the hydrodynamic oil film under the reported operating conditions (Figures 1, 2). Physical contact of the shaft with the bearing material is reflected by an elevated bearing temperature and, in most cases, at an exponential rate of rise.
In an isolated case involving extended operation beyond the alarm point (normally 65°C), bearing damage was even observed with a slower rate of temperature rise. The reported damages resulted in expensive and time-consuming repairs.
Bearing failure may lead to the risk of total loss or diminishment of main propulsion function capacity and, in some cases, may be detrimental to the propeller shaft in the event of steel-to-steel contact. In the event of long-term operation with incomplete propeller immersion which does not result in an immediate failure, the risk of fatigue-related bearing failures arising out of excessive cyclic loading and associated shear forces on the bearing will co-exist.
Typical design consideration – complete propeller immersion
Design criteria regulated by applicable DNV GL rules cover complete propeller immersion. Design margins also cater for some eccentric propeller loading, for instance, due to an inhomogeneous wake field and/or operation with the propeller blade tips in close vicinity of the water surface.
The shaft alignment philosophy incorporates an acceptable distribution of loading on the shaft bearings while taking into consideration the forces and associated bending moments induced by the propeller during operation. The propeller weight and hydrodynamic forces influences the angular misalignment of the shaft in way of the aft bearing (relative slope) and, subsequently, the shaft-bearing contact area.
Hydrodynamic lubrication conditions are predominantly influenced by the RPM, diameter of the shaft, viscosity of the oil, the net effective contact area of the shaft in way of the bearing and the bearing load. Contact area also regulates the local surface pressure applied on the bearing.
Exceptional operating condition – incomplete propeller immersion
Operation with incomplete propeller immersion may induce an excessive eccentric thrust on the propeller and, consequently, a downward bending moment on the shaft. This may result in exaggerated localized loads (edge loading) and surface pressure on the aft bearing arising out of an increased relative slope and reduced bearing contact area (Figures 3, 4, 5, 6).
Localized bearing loads acting on a diminished contact area, not catered for in the design criteria, lead to total or partial loss of an effective hydrodynamic oil film of minimum thickness. Hence, the risk of prospective consequential bearing damage co-exists under exceptional operating conditions with incomplete propeller immersion.
The additional bending moment generated is a function of the degree of lack of propeller immersion, RPM and the power. Elaborating this further, the bending moment is proportional to the thrust force, which is proportional to the square of the RPM. Consequently, increasing RPM introduces an exponential degree of risk in a partially submerged propeller condition.
Recommendations to operators
Operators are recommended to undertake suitable precautions during operation to ensure complete propeller immersion.
This may typically be achieved by a combination of:
- Suitable means of information in the on-board operating procedures
- Promoting increased awareness of the risk involved
- Defining precautionary measures under exceptional conditions
If exceptional operating conditions are unavoidable, e.g. reduced sea depth, light conditions to enter a dry dock or ballast exchange at sea etc., it would be prudent to carry out satisfactory design/risk assessment and the respective mitigating measures.
Such measures may include:
- Lower RPM/power
- Limited steering angles
- The use of tugs
Other risks arising out of similar operating conditions, e.g. change in torsional vibration characteristics, also need to be managed, but are not included in this technical news.
EU MRV and IMO DCS - some practical recommendations
This technical news contains some recommendations relevant to both EU MRV and IMO DCS.
Prepare for the Global Sulphur Cap 2020 with the IMO Ship Implementation Plan
The IMO has agreed on 1 January 2020 as the date for switching to 0.50% sulphur fuel globally. Now, as ship owners face the daunting task of preparing for the fuel oil switch, proper planning is essential. The IMO Guidance for developing a Ship Implementation Plan (SIP) is a useful tool, and described further in this technical news.
Survey by remote inspection techniques - use of approved service suppliers
The use of remote inspection techniques (RIT) is increasing. Today, drones, climbers, or robot arms, can be used as an alternative to close-up surveys in both the DNV GL rules and IACS Unified Requirements. RIT may significantly reduce the survey time and costs, while improving the safety of surveyors and the owner’s personnel. From 1 January 2019, DNV GL has approved the use of service suppliers for RIT. This technical news explains how RIT can be used and how suppliers can achieve DNV GL approval.
IMO requirements July 2018 to May 2021
This statutory news summarizes the most important IMO requirements entering into force from 1 July 2018 up to and including 31 May 2021.