- Keywords: Statutory, Maritime
Relevant for ship owners and managers, design offices, shipyards, suppliers and flag states.
There are currently 65 types of BWTS models that are accepted as an AMS (Alternate Management System) by the USCG. An AMS is basically a temporary acknowledgement of a flag (IMO) type approval by the USCG. An installed BWTS (AMS) can be used in US waters (without a USCG type approval) for a limited period of time.
When a manufacturer of a BWTS applies for the system to be an AMS, they also commit to proceed with the type approval testing per the USCG requirements.
Currently, there are ten USCG type approved BWTS. By the end of 2018, there will probably be 17 type approved systems in total. DNV GL has been involved (appointed as Independent Laboratory by the USCG) in ten of those systems for the type approval testing.
As a general observation, our experience is that for most systems going through the USCG type approval testing, changes are made to the BWTS (or its operating procedures), compared to the model originally tested under the requirements of the BWM Convention. This does not mean that the BWTS was poorly tested and certified in the flag (IMO) context, but changes have been made to also comply with the USCG requirements.
Examples of such changes are:
- The dose for treatment (e.g. amount of active substance [TRO] or UV-intensity)
- Automatic flow regulation to handle turbid (low UV-transmittance) water
- Electric components to comply with environmental requirements (ship’s working environment, e.g. vibrations)
- Software updates, for instance regarding control and monitoring, dosing philosophy or details for the treatment records
- Use of alternative components, where “equivalence” needs to be justified
- Revised OMSM (operation, maintenance and safety manual)
The question then becomes how this will affect a BWTS that was installed on a specific vessel before the USCG type approval of such a system was completed. To answer this, it is assumed that the vessel is operating in US waters and uses the BWTS (under the AMS).
Does the USCG type approval apply to this vessel’s installation the same day the type approval is granted by the USCG? The general answer is: no.
It is understood that a vessel has time until the AMS (vessel) expires for an installation (five years after the vessel’s compliance date or extended compliance date). Before such a compliance date, the vessel shall be provided with a copy of the USCG type approval certificate and an updated nameplate on the BWTS. The nameplate shall state the USCG type approval reference number and is subject to the USCG vessel inspection (see NVIC 01-18 from 1 March 2018 by the USCG).
Before the nameplate of the BWTS is changed, it is of paramount importance that the BWTS model installed is identical to the one that was type approved.
Here lies a great share of responsibility for the manufacturer of the BWTS to ensure that components, software, operating procedures and documentation are in accordance with the USCG type approval certificate.
In most cases, an upgrading kit is needed. It should be documented on board what has been done, during such upgrading, before the USCG type approval certificate and nameplate are awarded.
No installation/initial survey of the BWTS is required by the USCG and compliance, to DNV GL’s understanding, will be verified in the USCG vessel inspection scheme.
There are today more than 5,000 BWTS installed before the USCG type approval, and many of them will eventually need the USCG type approval certificate for discharge in US waters.
DNV GL recommends that all ship owners request a statement from the BWTS manufacturer to confirm that a BWTS, installed in the past on one of its vessels and now given a new nameplate referring to the USCG type approval, is “identical” to the model that was USCG type approved.
- AMS (Alternate Management Systems)
- USCG type approved systems
- USCG's NVIC 01-18
- USCG nameplate requirements (46 CFR §162.060-22)
- For customer: DATE - Direct Access to Technical Experts via My Services on Veracity
- Otherwise: use our office locator to find the nearest DNV GL maritime office or contact BWM@dnvgl.com
2020 Sulphur update - outcome of the MEPC 74
The 74th session of the Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC 74) was held at IMO in London on 13–17 May 2019. This was the last MEPC meeting before the 0.50% global sulphur limit takes effect on 1 January 2020, and the focus was on the implementation and completion of guidelines to help stakeholders prepare and ensure consistent implementation. We strongly recommend stakeholders to prepare in due course and update plans according to the latest IMO guidance. This statutory news contains a summary of sulphur-related resolutions and circulars adopted at MEPC 74.
EU MRV and IMO DCS - some practical recommendations
This technical news contains some recommendations relevant to both EU MRV and IMO DCS.
Prepare for the Global Sulphur Cap 2020 with the IMO Ship Implementation Plan
The IMO has agreed on 1 January 2020 as the date for switching to 0.50% sulphur fuel globally. Now, as ship owners face the daunting task of preparing for the fuel oil switch, proper planning is essential. The IMO Guidance for developing a Ship Implementation Plan (SIP) is a useful tool, and described further in this technical news.
Survey by remote inspection techniques - use of approved service suppliers
The use of remote inspection techniques (RIT) is increasing. Today, drones, climbers, or robot arms, can be used as an alternative to close-up surveys in both the DNV GL rules and IACS Unified Requirements. RIT may significantly reduce the survey time and costs, while improving the safety of surveyors and the owner’s personnel. From 1 January 2019, DNV GL has approved the use of service suppliers for RIT. This technical news explains how RIT can be used and how suppliers can achieve DNV GL approval.