- Keywords: Technical
Relevant for owners/managers of ships with watertight doors as well as for shipyards, design offices and flag states.
Large shipping losses have decreased by some 45% over the last decade, and it is evident that improved safety barriers for controlling flooding have a strong impact on reducing risk. Foundered (sunk or submerged) is the main cause of losses, accounting for half of all losses over the period 2005–2016. Grounding is the second major cause (20%) after fire (10%), while collision is the fourth major cause (7.3%).
For the major accident scenarios of foundering, grounding and collision, controlling the ship’s internal watertight integrity – and therein the watertight doors – can make a significant difference when it comes to reducing the consequences related to loss of life and asset. An open watertight door in a flooding scenario is a failure that rapidly may lead to capsizing or foundering depending on the ship design, and for which there may be no recovery.
Managing watertight doors as a safety barrier sounds like an easy, everyday task. However, it is indeed a highly complex operation involving technical systems, people and processes.
A watertight door compromises several technical systems (structural, electrical, hydraulic, control), with many possible failure modes, and the doors are constantly subject to wear and tear. Likewise, efficient barrier management depends on procedures describing correct operation during voyage and in emergency situations, as well as procedures ensuring correct and efficient maintenance. Finally, there is the human element of crew and officers, their awareness of the involved risk and the knowledge and motivation to operate the system correctly during operation and in cases of emergency.
By launching an awareness campaign targeting all relevant stakeholders in the industry, GARD and DNV GL intend to
- increase confidence in watertight doors as a barrier in case of flooding,
- create better understanding of how the watertight doors are designed and should be operated and maintained, and
- promote in-situ awareness of officers and crew members operating the doors.
A key element of the campaign is to develop a proactive closing culture. This means being prepared for possible external events such as a collision or grounding or bad weather. Another element is to create awareness regarding the occupational risk of incorrect passing of watertight doors, and reflect on potential conflicts this may create. The project team has also been working with the industry in assessing work orders in planned maintenance systems related to watertight doors. An example of work orders is part of the awareness campaign package.
The joint industry awareness training from GARD and DNV GL contains concrete recommendations for our shipping customers, for example:
- Crew preparedness – what should your crew be aware of?
- Management contribution – which actions could ship/shore management take?
- Industry contribution – how can manufacturers, the class society and flag administration contribute to reducing the risk of incidents related to the operation of watertight doors?
DNV GL recommends to use the watertight doors awareness material at your next safety meeting, officer conference or similar. GARD and DNV GL are delighted to support you on request.
More information about this awareness campaign is available on our watertight doors awareness web page.
- For customers: DATE – Direct Access to Technical Experts via My DNV GL
- Otherwise: Use our office locator to find the nearest DNV GL maritime office
Latest Technical and Regulatory News
17 July 2017 | Statutory | NEWSUpdated requirements to Bridge Alert Management (BAM) in the Marine Equipment Directive (MED)The Directive 2014/90/EU on Marine Equipment (MED) applies to equipment to be placed on board EU-flagged ships. Furthermore, IMO Resolution MSC.302(87) addresses the adoption of a performance standard for Bridge Alert Management (BAM) – this resolution is added as a requirement in MED. However, there is still no test standard in place covering BAM compliance of equipment. This news describes DNV GL’s interpretation of requirements for BAM compliance.
07 July 2017 | Statutory | NEWSMEPC 71 agrees to implementation dates for ballast water treatment systemsThe MEPC, at its 71st meeting, reached a compromise on compliance dates for ballast water discharge. Ships constructed after 8th September 2017 must comply on delivery, while existing ships in general must comply by the first IOPP renewal after 8th September 2019. The long-awaited agreement will have global impact. It provides certainty to the maritime community regarding the mandatory compliance dates for treatment of ballast water discharge.
07 July 2017 | PSC | NEWSConcentrated inspection campaigns on Safety of Navigation and Life Saving AppliancesThe Port State Control’s concentrated inspection campaigns (CIC) on Safety of Navigation and Life Saving Appliances will start on 1 September 2017. CICs are periodical inspections that focus on a specific topic and are carried out during routine PSC inspections with an additional checklist for a period of 3 months. This PSC news summarizes DNV GL’s considerations on how to prepare for the upcoming inspections.
07 July 2017 | PSC | NEWSMSA China – Special inspection campaign on bulk carriersThe China Maritime Safety Administration (MSA) has launched a special inspection on bulk carriers from 15 June to 31 December 2017. The inspection will be carried out in conjunction with the Port State Control (PSC) inspection and Flag State Control (FSC) inspection.